The Crucible by Arthur Miller. Set during the Salem witch trials, the play dramatizes how accusations and personal testimonies can override objective evidence. Judges in the play struggle to distinguish truth from hysteria, weighing conflicting testimonies and scant evidence. The play critiques and exemplifies the American tradition of judicial inquiry, showing both its strengths and its dangers when subjective testimony overwhelms objective fact.
All Quiet on the Western Front
Im Westen nichts Neues. (All Quiet on the Western Front, 2022). This Oscar-winning adaptation of Erich Maria Remarque’s novel presents World War I from a German soldier’s perspective. The film meticulously reconstructs the horrors and motivations of war, focusing on the evidence of human suffering, bureaucratic decision-making, and the negotiations leading to the armistice. Its narrative avoids stereotypes and instead seeks to understand the causes and consequences of conflict through detailed, fact-based storytelling.
Twelve Angry Men
Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose: This classic play (and its film adaptation) focuses on a jury deliberating the fate of a young defendant. The jurors must sift through the facts of the case and the credibility of witness statements, debating until they reach a unanimous verdict. The story is a direct metaphor for the American conflict resolution style: careful, collective weighing of evidence and testimony before rendering judgment.
Rauch. Feuer.
Wo Rauch ist, ist auch Feuer. Translation: Where there’s smoke, there’s fire. Meaning: If there are signs of a problem, there must be a cause. This phrase reflects the German tendency to look for underlying reasons and not dismiss evidence or symptoms.
auf den Grund gehen
Den Dingen auf den Grund gehen. Translation: Get to the bottom of things. Meaning: Investigate thoroughly to understand the real reasons behind a conflict or problem.
present proof
Beweise auf den Tisch legen. Translation: Put the evidence on the table. Meaning: Present proof; don’t just make claims. This is a direct call for objective evidence in any discussion or dispute.
Historikerstreit
The Historikerstreit (Historians’ Dispute) of the 1980s. This major public debate among German historians centered on how to interpret and assign responsibility for the Holocaust and National Socialism. Two main camps—intentionalists (who argued for planned intent behind Nazi crimes) and functionalists (who emphasized structural and circumstantial factors)—relied heavily on documentary evidence, archival research, and systematic analysis to reconstruct the causes of these events. The dispute exemplified Germany’s insistence on rigorous, evidence-based inquiry and the search for historical truth, even in highly politicized contexts.
Wannsee Documentation
The Wannsee Conference Documentation (1942). The discovery and use of the minutes from the Wannsee Conference, where senior Nazi officials coordinated the “Final Solution,” became a cornerstone in understanding the bureaucratic and systematic nature of the Holocaust. These documents provided incontrovertible evidence of planning and intent, shaping both legal reckoning and historical understanding in postwar Germany.
Vergangenheitsbewältigung
Postwar Trials and Vergangenheitsbewältigung (Coming to Terms with the Past). After World War II, Germany’s approach to dealing with Nazi crimes was grounded in the collection and presentation of objective evidence—such as documents, photographs, and testimonies—during the Nuremberg Trials and subsequent legal proceedings. This process set a precedent for addressing historical wrongdoing through meticulous reconstruction of facts and causes.
Roads not Taken
The Exhibition “Roads not Taken. Or: Things Could Have Turned Out Differently.” This exhibition at the Deutsches Historisches Museum explores key turning points in German history by reconstructing the causes and circumstances of major events, and also examining alternative outcomes that were possible but did not occur. The exhibit’s very premise reflects the German logic of analyzing contingencies, actions, and omissions to understand why history unfolded as it did.