Below are examples of how companies might embed our insights in their AI systems, with one application for each of UC’s 10 research topics.
The specific applications depend on workflows, tools, and business priorities. Systems can be configured to detect situations automatically and prompt users, or to respond when users ask questions.
Real-Time Communication Coaching
When employees draft messages to multinational colleagues, communication tools can provide real-time cultural guidance.
Before an American sends feedback to a German colleague, the system might prompt: “Germans prefer direct, unambiguous language. State the issue clearly without softening. Directness is seen as efficient and honest, not rude.”
Conversely, when Germans write to Americans about sensitive topics: “Americans often use indirect language for politeness. Consider approaching the topic more gradually and using softening language to maintain rapport.”
Agreement Tracking & Follow-up Alerts
Project management systems can adjust follow-up protocols based on cultural expectations.
When Americans and Germans establish agreements, the system might prompt: “German colleagues consider agreed commitments fixed and may not expect frequent check-ins. Excessive follow-up may signal lack of trust. Americans use frequent follow-up to maintain shared understanding of priorities and status.
Establish explicit follow-up protocols up-front to prevent misunderstandings about commitment and communication expectations.”
Presentation Preparation Support
When preparing presentations for multinational audiences, collaboration tools can surface cultural considerations.
For Americans presenting to German stakeholders: “Germans separate message from messenger. Let your analysis and data speak. Minimize personal stories and charisma. Focus on logical argumentation and evidence.”
For Germans presenting to American audiences: “Americans link message and messenger. Connect personally with your audience. Use stories and examples. Remember: you sell yourself first, then your ideas.”
Decision Process Alignment
Workflow tools can help teams navigate different decision-making timelines. When Germans and Americans collaborate on decisions, systems might prompt:
“Germans believe decision time should match decision importance, regardless of external pressure. Americans often prefer fast, imperfect decisions that can be corrected.
Discuss explicitly: Is this a ‘thorough analysis’ decision or a ‘decide and adjust’ decision? Align on timeline expectations before proceeding to prevent frustration on both sides.”
Task Assignment Clarity
When leaders assign tasks across cultures, management systems can highlight different expectations.
For American leaders managing German teams: “Germans prefer mission-oriented tasks that define ‘what’ but leave ‘how’ to the implementer. Specify objectives and boundaries, then trust professional judgment on execution.”
For German leaders managing American teams: “Americans often prefer more specific guidance on both what and how. Provide clearer direction on approach and methods. Share responsibility for implementation strategy.”
Feedback Setting Recommendations
Performance management tools can guide managers on appropriate feedback settings.
When providing critical feedback to German employees: “Germans sometimes accept open criticism in team settings if it serves to get issues on the table. However, assess individual and situation carefully. One-to-one is safer unless team learning is essential.”
When providing feedback to American employees: “Americans expect sensitive feedback in private, one-to-one settings. Public criticism, even mild, can damage relationships and trust. Discretion is highly valued, especially for negative feedback.”
Escalation Guidance
When conflicts arise in cross-cultural teams, collaboration tools can provide cultural context re: escalation.
For American team members: “Germans view conflicts as fundamentally negative and escalation as a last resort. Managers are expected to prevent conflicts, because escalation signals their failure. Attempt resolution at working level before escalating.”
For German team members: “Americans view conflicts as normal and escalation as a legitimate right to seek resolution. Early escalation is often expected and acceptable. Don’t interpret escalation as personal attack or organizational dysfunction.”
Quality Expectations Alignment
When defining product specifications across regions, development tools can surface different quality frameworks.
For teams with German stakeholders: “For Germans, Qualität is all-encompassing—a striving to exceed market expectations regardless of other factors. Quality is not merely one characteristic among many.”
For teams with American stakeholders: “Americans view quality as one characteristic among several, always in relation to price. Focus on value: the optimal balance of quality and cost for the target market.”
Process Improvement Approaches
When implementing or changing processes, workflow systems can highlight different cultural views.
For German teams: “Germans view product and process as inseparable. Good processes guarantee good results. Process quality directly determines product quality. Invest time in process design and adherence.”
For American teams: “Americans view processes as tools—means to an end that enable work organization. Processes should not replace human judgment. Be prepared to adapt processes based on practical results and changing circumstances.”
Customer Relationship Positioning
When engaging with multinational customers, CRM systems can guide relationship approaches.
For Americans working with German customers: “Germans prefer consulting relationships ‘auf Augenhöhe’ (at eye-level). Position as expert partner, not servant. Avoid over-accommodating language. Germans respect suppliers who maintain professional equality and push back when needed.”
For Germans working with American customers: “Americans don’t strongly distinguish between serving and consulting. The customer is always in charge. Focus on service excellence while bringing expertise. Avoid appearing inflexible or hierarchical in the relationship.”
Back to Enterprises.