Before I Voted Against It

On March 16, 2004, Senator John Kerry, then running for president, spoke at Marshall University in Huntington, West Virginia. About an $87 billion bill for Iraq, he said: “I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it.”

The Bush campaign used the line in television ads to present Kerry as a man who changes positions. At the Republican convention that year, delegates brought flip-flop sandals. Kerry later called his remark “one of those inarticulate moments.”

A One-Handed Economist

“Can’t somebody bring me a one-handed economist?” Harry Truman is often quoted as saying this about advisers who weighed both sides of every question. The economist Walter Heller told the story in the New York Times in 1974.

Quote Investigator found no solid contemporary evidence that Truman said it. The earliest similar version it found appeared on June 12, 1936, in a Scripps-Howard editorial: “what the Republicans need is a one-armed platform writer.”

Confidence Is Contagious

The Army’s leadership doctrine, ADP 6-22 of July 31, 2019, lists confidence among the attributes of a leader’s presence. “Confidence is the faith leaders place in their abilities to make decisions and take appropriate action in any situation, no matter how stressful or ambiguous.” The doctrine adds: “A leader’s confidence is contagious and permeates the entire organization.”

It also warns: “Effective leaders temper confidence with humility.”

The Ah-Counter

At a Toastmasters meeting, one member serves as the Ah-Counter. The task is to “note any overused words or filler sounds used as a crutch by anyone who speaks during the meeting.” Toastmasters asks that the report be delivered “in a positive, supportive way.”

Ralph C. Smedley organized the first permanent Toastmasters club. It met at the YMCA in Santa Ana, California, on October 22, 1924.

The Vocabulary of Conviction

Fake it till you make it. Act confident until the confidence is real.

Own the room. Hold the attention and respect of everyone present.

Make the call. Decide, especially when others hesitate.

Waffle. Avoid a clear position, or keep changing it.

Wishy-washy. Weak and without a clear opinion.

Lead with the answer. Give the recommendation first and the reasons after.

Vigorous Cross-Examination

In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, decided on June 28, 1993, the Supreme Court made trial judges gatekeepers for expert testimony. “The trial judge must ensure that any and all scientific testimony or evidence admitted is not only relevant, but reliable.” A key question is whether a theory “can be (and has been) tested.”

Admitted evidence still faces attack. The Court named “vigorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof” as “the traditional and appropriate means of attacking shaky but admissible evidence.”

Murder Boards

Before nominees face a Senate confirmation hearing, their teams hold practice hearings called murder boards. In 2010 about 20 members of the Obama team played senators and questioned Elena Kagan for several hours a day. Rachel Brand, who helped prepare John Roberts and Samuel Alito, described the aim: to “ask those hard questions in the nastiest conceivable way, over and over and over.”

In January 2017 the Trump transition team held 30 practice hearings for cabinet nominees, more than 70 hours in all.

The Airport Test

In December 2012 the sociologist Lauren Rivera published a study of hiring at elite professional service firms in the American Sociological Review. It drew on 120 interviews with employers. “Employers sought candidates who were not only competent but also culturally similar to themselves in terms of leisure pursuits, experiences, and self-presentation styles.”

Such concerns “often outweighed concerns about absolute productivity.” Evaluators described an “airport test”: whether they would want to be stuck in an airport with the candidate.

Competent Jerks, Lovable Fools

In 2005 Tiziana Casciaro and Miguel Sousa Lobo reported in the Harvard Business Review on how people in four organizations chose whom to work with. “Personal feelings played a more important role in forming work relationships.” If someone is strongly disliked, “it’s almost irrelevant whether or not she is competent.”

Their conclusion: “a little extra likability goes a longer way than a little extra competence.”

understand-culture
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.