strategy and tactics

Kareem about Wooden

One of the greatest scorers in the history of NBA basketball in the United States. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, formerly Lew Alcindor. An intelligent, very thoughtful person. On and off the basketball court.

He, like so many other players at UCLA – University of California Los Angeles – who played under coach John Wooden, was greatly influenced by Wooden.

In this talk Abdul-Jabbar speaks about the great strengths of John Wooden. Not only in how he formed great basketball players and teams. But more importantly how he formed young men. And they were as players at UCLA young men between the ages of 18 and 22.

Why is this post listed under Germany instead of the USA? Because Wooden’s approach to coaching is more indicative of the German leadership logic than of the American.

Wooden did not coach his players during the game. He gave only some very general instructions. Instead, he allowed them to apply what he had taught them during practice.

John Wooden always referred to himself as a basketball teacher. By the way, the official professional name for a soccer coach in the German Bundesliga is Fussball-Lehrer, literally soccer teacher.

How to Be Like Coach Wooden: Life Lessons From Basketball’s Greatest Leader, by Pat Williams (2006, with David Wimbish): “He (Wooden) always focused on the details. He was a teacher who happened to be a basketball coach.”

Flexibility and Independence

Under the title “What American universities can learn from German universities,” Mark Roche, Professor of German studies at the University of Notre Dame, writes:

“Intellectual independence, knowledge as an end in itself, high regard for the humanities: the German university system could serve as a model for the United States in many ways.

What can the United States learn? First, student flexibility and independence, both characteristics of the German university tradition, are important principles of learning. Students learn more when they have to demonstrate independence and initiative.

Before the reform of European universities (the so-called Bologna Process), German students had the freedom to devote themselves to intellectual questions in an organic way, in a manner quite different from the student mentality at most American universities.

There (in American universities), students are given a lot of homework that does not encourage them to delve deeper into a topic for its own sake or to pursue further questions arising from their studies on their own initiative.

Thanks to their education in independence, the best German students proved to be highly motivated and responsible. Self-education requires freedom.”

Source: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, June 13, 2015.

“… when not to obey”

Here are two famous quotes illustrating the German/Prussian military tradition emphasizing the need for officers to exercise judgment even if it means disobeying orders:

The first historic anecdote involves Friedrich Wilhelm von Seydlitz, a Prussian cavalry commander, who reportedly told his king during the Battle of Zorndorf (1758): “Tell the King that after the battle my head is at his disposal, but meanwhile I will make use of it.” This reflects the attitude that obedience alone is not enough; an officer must think critically and may need to disobey orders for the greater good.

Another related quote references a Prussian officer being told by Prince Frederick Charles (1868-1940): “His Majesty made you a Major because he believed you would know when not to obey his orders.“ This illustrates the principle that obedience has limits and military leaders must sometimes disobey orders based on the situation.

These quotes capture the essence of Auftragstaktik, the Prussian concept of mission-type orders, where the officer is entrusted with the freedom to decide the best way to achieve the goal.

“Stop Being Micromanaged”

Harvard Business Review. “Stop Being Micromanaged.” Amy Gallo, September 22, 2011.

There are managers who have very high standards who like some degree of control. They pay a great deal of attention to detail and exercise some degree of control, but they don’t stifle those who work for them.

Then there are pathological micromanagers who need to make it clear to themselves and others that they are in charge. These are the bosses that give you little to no autonomy, insist they be involved in every detail of your work, and are more concerned about specifics, such as font size, rather than the big picture.”

It is counterproductive to fight against micromanagement. Gallo suggests: “Make upfront agreements. Talk to your boss before a project starts about how she will be involved. Try to agree on standards and basic approach.

Explain what you think the ideal plan of action is and then ask for her input. Be sure you understand upfront what the guiding principles are for the work, not just the tactical elements. These principles are what you should be discussing with your boss.

The author recommends: “Remind your boss that she is better off not getting involved in the minutiae because her time and effort are more valuable to the big picture. And keep your boss in the loop.”

Americans, those leading as well as those being led, prefer specifically formulated, command oriented tasks. The command addresses both the what, and the how. Overall responsibility for the how is shared by both levels. Examples

Strategy and Tactics

Germans, those leading as well as those being led, prefer generally formulated, mission oriented tasks. The task addresses more the what and less the how. Responsibilitiy for the how lies with the implementer on the tactical level. Examples

Strategy and Tactics

German Approach

American Approach

American View

German leadership is seen by American team members as distanced, not adequately involved, almost passive, at times even absent. Tasks assigned are so broadly defined that implementation can be difficult to define. Americans expect more detail concerning the what, but are often reluctant to address the issue.

German View

Germans experience American leadership as too involved on the implementation level. American hands-on coaching can come across as top-down micromanagement. They perceive their American lead as “telling me how to do my job.”

Advice to Germans

Make clear to your American team members to what degree you will spell out the tasks you assign. In other words, how they should do their work on the tactical level. Take the time to speak with them about where you draw the line between strategy (what) and tactics (how).

Develop an on-going dialogue about where that line is. It is, and should be, fluid and flexible. Americans are motivated and successful when their team lead is actively involved in their work. If you don‘t manage on the tactical level, you run the risk of becoming irrelevant.

You work in a team led by an American. Your American lead wants you to succeed. Your success is his/her success, also. If for you the how is too well defined, too prescriptive, first reflect on it.

Formulate your approach, then discuss it with your lead, so that he/she remains involved, can agree, overrule or modify. Engage, and remain, in that dialogue, for the entire duration of your work together.

Advice to Americans

When leading Germans be more teacher than coach. Germans want to succeed on their own and in their own way. Give them space. They‘ll come for advice soon enough. If they need your advice, but don‘t request it, send discreet, respectful signals that you‘re approachable, that you want to help.

As recommended to your German colleagues who lead Americans, establish a dialogue with your German team members about where you draw the line between strategy (what) and tactics (how). Depending on the situation, that line will move in one direction or the other. Remain in constant contact with each other.

Your boss is German? If it is not clear what she or he expects, don‘t request clarity immediately. Define your role. Rely on your education, training and experience. Then either execute based on that or request input.

If you do ask for input, go into the discussion like a junior partner in a consulting firm seeking advice (not direction) from a more experienced colleague. But, be prepared to hear: “There is no need for me to spell that out for you. You’re a professional. You should know how to do your job.”