The Legal Consciousness of the Japanese

In 1967, the legal scholar Kawashima Takeyoshi published Nihonjin no hō-ishiki (The Legal Consciousness of the Japanese). He argued that the Japanese lacked a sense of rights. Since the Edo period, lawsuits had often ended not in a judgment but in a settlement between the parties. A dispute was best settled “roundly,” in a way that did not destroy the community relationship.

The book became the starting point of postwar research on legal consciousness. Later scholars have disputed much of it.

The Myth of the Reluctant Litigant

In 1978, the American legal scholar John O. Haley published “The Myth of the Reluctant Litigant.” He argued that cultural explanations for the small number of lawsuits in Japan were overblown.

In his view, the reason was the limited capacity of the legal system. Japan had relatively few lawyers per person, and few judges, with high caseloads and long delays.

Barred from Public Contracts

Japanese public agencies can suspend a contractor from nomination for public contracts, a shimei teishi. One ground in the rules of a research institute of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism is dishonest or unfaithful conduct in business, which makes the company unsuitable as a contract partner.

The suspension lasts from one to nine months. In one case in 2024, it ran for four months.

understand-culture
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.