lines of communication

Plumber, Electrician, Banker

In German companies the head of a department or project team assigns tasks to the team and to individual members, who carry them out ideally without any supervision. This logic is also at play in business relationships between customer and supplier.

When a German contracts a craftsman or mechanic – plumber, electrician, handyman – to do a job, he or she does not go beyond explaining the problem which needs to be solved. Everything else is left up to the person contracted to completed the job. The German customer expects the job to get done without any more input or oversight from them.

It‘s the same approach when one goes to the bank. The customer explains their financial situation, states their goals and then expects the financial advisor to do the rest, meaning come up with a financial plan. The bank employee, like the plumber, only contacts the customer if it is absolutely necessary.

Telegraph as Threat

„The most unfortunate officer in the field, is the one who is distracted by headquarters with daily, even hourly requests for reports on his strategy, tactics and intentions, quite often from an overly self-important junior staff officer with access to a telegraph line.“ General Helmuth von Moltke, Head of the Prussian General Staff

Working independently

Many job advertisements will promise their employees the opportunity to work independently. An independent work environment, without constant oversight or having someone ‘looking over your shoulder’, is viewed very positively.

This is also an indicator of trust. Constant check-ins with one’s boss about the status of a project are neither necessary nor desired. In the German workplace, too many check-ins suggests an over-dependence on guidance on the part of the employee. Such ‘needy’ employees require a lot of ‘hand-holding’ – something which no German employer feels like doing.

Bernard Schriever – Black Saturday

In his book A Fiery Peace in a Cold War: Bernard Schriever and the Ultimate Weapon (2010) author Neil Sheehan describes the life and work of Bernard Schriever, who is considered to be the father of the American nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).

Schriever and his military and civilian colleagues believed firmly that if both the United States and the Soviet Union possessed these weapons of mass destruction the probability of them being used actually would be decreased.

Schriever had to overcome strong institutional resistance within the U.S. Air Force whose leadership was convinced that manned aircraft﹣strategic long-range bombers﹣was the only way to maintain a credible deterrent against the Soviet Union.

Through telling the story of Bernard Schriever and the development of the American ballistic missile program from the end of Second World War up to the mid-1960s Sheehan tells the history of the Cold War, which would last up until the 1990s with the Fall of the Berlin Wall, the unification of West and East Germany, the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union, and the freedom of Eastern Europe from Russian domination.

In a 2010 television interview (Booknotes on C-SPAN) Sheehan contrasted Schriever with his American-born military colleagues, Generals Paul Harkins and William Westmoreland, both who had overall command of U.S. forces in the Vietnam War.

Schriever would tell his subordinates that he would never fire anyone for failing, but instead for failing to inform him immediately of problems. For Schriever, as stated by Sheehan, success would take care of itself if one focused on solving the problems at hand. Go to minutes 25:10 to 26:50.

Sheehan had been a young war correspondent in Vietnam for United Press International (UPI), later with the New York Times. As told in his book A Bright Shining Lie (1989), which won both the Pulitzer Prize and the National Book Award, the American generalship during the Vietnam War was unwilling to accept that America was losing that war.

General Schriever, according to Sheehan‘s research, made clear time and again to the members of this organization, whether military or civilian, that he wanted timely and accurate reports on the problems the program was experiencing, and was far less interested in the progress made.

So-called progress reports had become common within the U.S. military after the Second World War, and according to Sheehan, symptomatic for an institution unwilling to face what was not working.

Bernard Adolph Schriever was born in 1910 in the German port city of Bremen. His father was an engineer. They immigrated to the U.S. only months before the U.S. entered the First World War in 1917.

Schriever grew up in New Braunfels, Texas, an area mostly populated by German immigrants. Read about his fascinating life in Wikipedia

Because Americans, those leading as well as those being led, prefer specific, command oriented tasks (both what and how), they maintain shorter lines of communication: more interaction, status meetings, iteration on tactical issues. Examples

Lines of Communication

Because Germans, those leading as well as those being led, prefer generally formulated, mission oriented tasks (more what, less how), they maintain longer lines of communication: less interaction, fewer status meetings, fewer iterations on tactical issues. Examples

Lines of Communication

German Approach

American Approach

American View

German team leads undercommunicate. “Face time” with the boss is in short supply. It becomes difficult to know, understand, or predict what the lead wants. It requires unnecessary guesswork, can be demotivating, and in most cases is seen as a lack of involvement.

German View

American leads overcommunicate. “Visiting the troops” and „management by walking around“ is interpreted as unwarranted and annoying supervision and control. It is distracting, demotivating, and in many cases viewed as a sign of mistrust.

Advice to Germans

Manage more like a player-coach versus a teacher-coach. Stay engaged with your people on the tactical level. You need not become overly prescriptive. You need not „change into your uniform and get onto the field“, but at a minimum stay involved as their coach.

Increase your communication with the team by 50%: staff meetings, phone calls, „drop by and say hello“. You won‘t feel comfortable doing it. You‘ll think it‘s a waste of time. You‘ll fear it will distract, or even unsettle, your team. It won‘t do any of they things. You won‘t succeed without shorter lines of communication.

Your American boss overcommunicates? It is not a sign of mistrust. On the contrary, you should worry about your performance if you see and hear less and less from your American lead!

The higher the level of communication, the more relevant your work, the more important you are for the success of the team. Enjoy the interaction. Engage with your team lead. You can exert influence on strategy and important decisions.

Advice to Americans

You lead Germans? Reduce your communication by 50%. You won‘t like it. You‘ll feel deprived of the key tool in managing your team. You‘ll wonder what to do with your time.

Focus on the broader strategic issues which can positively or negatively impact on your team. Remove roadblocks to their success. And, use the time to protect your team from those constant internal turf-battles so famous within German companies.

Your German boss undercommunicates? Experiencing „face time withdrawal“? It is not an indication that you have a problem, in fact, it‘s the exact opposite!

Your German lead is communicating with you. The message is: „Hey, you‘re doing a great job. I can leave you alone. I spend my time on the problems, not on the areas which are working. Keep up the good work. Maybe we‘ll bump into each other some time!“