Chinese communication often delivers criticism through implication rather than direct statement. Instead of “Your analysis is flawed,” you might hear “Perhaps this section could benefit from additional consideration” or “Some stakeholders might have questions about this approach.” This isn’t evasion—it’s a communication technology that allows evaluative content to be exchanged while maintaining working relationships. Both parties understand what’s being said. Learn to hear the message beneath the form: suggestions are often corrections, questions often indicate problems, and mentions of what others might think often reflect the speaker’s own view.
When delivering feedback yourself, consider using similar strategies. Frame criticism as questions, reference external standards rather than personal judgment, or note what something “could” be rather than what it lacks. You’ll often get better reception and the same message across.
Comments