Brazilians evaluate products against contextual requirements, not abstract standards. The question is whether a product adequately serves its intended purpose in its actual context—not whether it achieves theoretical excellence. Different contexts require different products. Professional daily use demands different quality than occasional home use.
Large families need different products than singles. Urban circumstances differ from rural ones. Brazilian evaluation calibrates to these differences rather than applying one universal standard. Adequacy doesn’t mean accepting poor quality.
An adequate product fully meets contextual requirements—it works reliably and serves its purpose well. But adequacy doesn’t require exceeding requirements. Excellence beyond what’s needed is optional, not mandatory. This orientation enables satisfaction: consumers can find genuine contentment with products that meet actual needs rather than feeling inadequate for not owning the theoretically best.
Comments