Void for Vagueness

An Oklahoma law required contractors on state work to pay at least “the current rate of per diem wages in the locality where the work is performed.” The penalties were heavy and charged by the day. General Construction Company, which was building bridges for the state, went to court to stop the law from being enforced against it.

On January 4, 1926, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed. It ruled that “a statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application violates the first essential of due process of law.”

The Court found “a double uncertainty.” A current wage rate is really a range of rates. Whether a place lay within the “locality” would also depend on “the probably varying impressions of juries.”

understand-culture
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.