Baird and Marks & Spencer

Baird Textile Holdings supplied Marks & Spencer for about 30 years. There was no written long-term contract. Marks & Spencer ended the relationship without warning.

Baird argued that the relationship amounted to an implied contract. On 28 February 2001, the Court of Appeal disagreed. It found the supposed agreement too uncertain and saw no intention to be legally bound. In its view, “there is no necessity to imply any contract.”

understand-culture
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.